The Comedic Veil: How the Satirization of Victims and the Humorization of Serious Harm Normalize Systemic Harm and Accelerate Apathy
Author: Bharat Luthra
PART I
The Cognitive Architecture of the Comedic Veil: Satirization of Victims, Moral Reframing, and the Erosion of Empathic Consciousness
Abstract
This paper develops the framework of the Comedic Veil, a socio-cognitive phenomenon in which serious harm, injustice, corruption, inequality, and victims are repeatedly filtered through humor, satire, ridicule, and irony, leading to a progressive decline in moral urgency and empathic response. Contrary to the widespread assumption that humor merely entertains or critiques power, interdisciplinary research in psychology, media cognition, and moral disengagement demonstrates that comedic framing can reclassify moral events, reduce perceived severity of harm, and normalize structural wrongdoing.
The central thesis asserts that suffering itself is not altered through humor. Rather, the perception of the victim and the seriousness of the harm undergo satirical distortion. When victims are caricatured and systemic injustices are repeatedly converted into jokes, public consciousness shifts from moral engagement to passive spectatorship. Over time, outrage is metabolized into amusement, amusement into familiarity, and familiarity into entrenched apathy. Because empathy functions as a foundational mechanism for collective survival and social cohesion, the normalization of serious harm through humor represents not merely a cultural tendency but a structural civilizational risk.
1. Introduction: The Illusion of Harmless Humor
Modern discourse operates on a deeply ingrained assumption that humor is inherently benign, therapeutic, or socially corrective. However, emerging research in psychology and communication studies indicates that satire, ridicule, and ironic framing do not merely soften difficult realities but actively reshape perception, judgment, and ethical prioritization.
When a victim becomes the subject of humor, the suffering is not logically erased.
It is perceptually downgraded.
When corruption, inequality, injustice, and unfairness are repeatedly presented as jokes or comedic commentary, they cease to be cognitively processed as moral emergencies and instead become recurring cultural narratives. The mind does not deny the existence of harm. It reinterprets its seriousness.
2. Conceptual Clarification: Satirization of Victims and Humor-Normalization of Serious Harm
A critical theoretical distinction must be established for precision.
Serious harm and suffering remain objectively real regardless of framing.
What undergoes distortion is:
the perceived humanity of the victim
the perceived gravity of injustice
the perceived urgency of systemic harm
Thus, the phenomenon is not the satirization of suffering itself but the satirization of victims and the humorization of serious harm.
This distinction is essential because the comedic veil does not function through denial. It functions through reinterpretation. Observers remain aware of harm, yet their emotional and moral response becomes attenuated due to comedic reframing.
3. The Satirization of Victims: From Moral Subject to Narrative Object
The satirization of victims refers to the cognitive transformation of a harmed individual or group from a moral subject deserving empathy into a narrative object of amusement, irony, or symbolic commentary.
Behavioral and discourse research indicates that satirical portrayals often reduce the use of humanizing language toward targets and increase caricature-based perception. This does not reduce awareness of harm but reduces empathic identification with the victim.
The psychological shift is subtle but profound:
The victim is not seen as less harmed.
The victim is seen as less emotionally real.
Once this shift occurs, observers detach from the shared human condition and begin perceiving suffering as distant abstraction, performance, or spectacle.
4. Humor as Moral Reframing and Cognitive Reclassification
Moral disengagement theory provides a structural explanation for how individuals cognitively reinterpret harmful realities without experiencing ethical discomfort. Humor functions as a powerful vehicle for such reinterpretation because it bypasses defensive resistance and lowers emotional threat perception.
This mechanism operates through three interrelated cognitive processes:
Semantic Sanitization
Language associated with injustice and suffering is replaced with irony, sarcasm, or comedic phrasing, reducing emotional intensity.
Diminution of Moral Stakes
Repeated joking about corruption, inequality, injustice, and unfair systems causes the brain to process these issues as recurring absurdities rather than actionable crises.
Caricature Compression
Complex human suffering is simplified into symbolic comedic identities, directing attention toward the joke rather than the lived reality of harm.
Framing research consistently shows that events presented humorously are judged as less severe, less urgent, and less morally alarming than identical events presented in serious contexts.
5. The Humorization of Corruption, Inequality, Injustice, and Unfairness
One of the most critical dimensions of the Comedic Veil is the repetitive joking about systemic societal harms. In contemporary discourse, corruption scandals, institutional injustice, economic inequality, bureaucratic inefficiency, and governance failures are frequently discussed through satire, memes, ironic commentary, and comedic narratives.
This repeated humorization produces psychological familiarity.
Familiarity reduces emotional shock.
Reduced shock weakens moral urgency.
Over time, structural harms transition from being perceived as crises to being perceived as cultural constants. The mind adapts to their presence not through acceptance in principle, but through normalization in perception.
6. The Normalization Pathway: From Moral Crisis to Cultural Routine
The Comedic Veil operates through a progressive normalization pathway grounded in cognitive and behavioral conditioning.
Stage One: Desensitization
Repeated comedic exposure to serious issues dulls emotional responsiveness and reduces empathic arousal.
Stage Two: Spectacle Conversion
Serious harm becomes content for consumption rather than a trigger for ethical engagement. Public discourse shifts from moral analysis to humorous commentary.
Stage Three: Apathy Consolidation
Society remains aware of injustice, corruption, and inequality but becomes emotionally disengaged and psychologically accustomed to their persistence.
Desensitization research in media psychology supports this progression, demonstrating that repeated stylized exposure to negative phenomena reduces emotional intensity and intervention motivation.
7. Narrative Framing and the Misperception of Authentic Distress
Narrative psychology suggests that the form of presentation significantly influences emotional interpretation. When serious harm is expressed through satire, irony, or fictionalized formats, audiences may interpret the message aesthetically rather than empathetically.
This leads to a critical distortion:
The suffering is processed as narrative expression rather than lived experience.
As a result, victims whose experiences are conveyed through indirect, poetic, or ironic mediums may be perceived as exaggerated, performative, or dramatic instead of genuinely harmed.
8. Media Ecosystems and the Structural Reinforcement of the Comedic Veil
Modern media and digital ecosystems amplify humorous content due to engagement-driven architectures. High-arousal emotions such as amusement, ridicule, and irony generate faster and wider dissemination than empathy-driven discourse.
This produces a systemic imbalance:
Comedic interpretations of serious harm receive greater visibility
Nuanced moral discussions receive comparatively limited reach
Over time, public consciousness becomes conditioned to encounter serious societal issues primarily through humorous framing, reinforcing normalization and emotional detachment.
9. The Cultural Conditioning Effect of Repetitive Humor
When societies repeatedly joke about corruption, inequality, injustice, and unfair systems, a conditioning loop emerges. Repetition transforms extraordinary harms into psychologically routine phenomena.
The paradox is structurally dangerous:
The more a society jokes about injustice,
the more psychologically familiar injustice becomes.
Psychological familiarity does not eliminate awareness.
It erodes urgency.
This erosion gradually shifts public response from outrage to cynical amusement and eventually to passive resignation.
10. Empathy, Consciousness, and Civilizational Stability
Empathy is not merely a moral virtue but a functional necessity for social cohesion, institutional accountability, and collective survival. Societies respond to systemic threats only when moral consciousness remains active.
When the Comedic Veil dominates discourse, empathy is not destroyed instantly. It is slowly diluted. Citizens may remain informed about corruption, inequality, and injustice while simultaneously becoming less emotionally responsive to them.
This state of informed apathy is more dangerous than ignorance because awareness without emotional engagement produces inaction.
11. Conclusion of Part I
The Comedic Veil represents a cognitive and cultural mechanism through which serious harm is not denied but perceptually diluted through humor, satire, and ridicule. By satirizing victims and repeatedly humorizing corruption, inequality, injustice, and unfairness, societies undergo a gradual psychological transition:
Outrage becomes amusement.
Amusement becomes familiarity.
Familiarity becomes apathy.
This transformation does not require suppression of information or denial of wrongdoing. It only requires sustained comedic framing of serious harm.
When moral crises become recurring jokes, they cease to function as moral alarms. Instead, they become normalized elements of cultural discourse, weakening empathic consciousness and conditioning societies to coexist with systemic injustice rather than confront it.
Part II will examine real-world systemic manifestations of the Comedic Veil across digital culture, political discourse, institutional narratives, and media ecosystems, with empirical analysis of how humor-driven normalization of serious harm is already operational in modern societies.
PART II
Systemic Manifestations of the Comedic Veil: Media Ecosystems, Political Discourse, Digital Culture, and the Institutional Incentivization of Apathy
Abstract
While the cognitive architecture of the Comedic Veil explains how humor reframes moral perception, its true impact becomes visible at the systemic level. This part examines how the satirization of victims and the repeated humorization of corruption, inequality, injustice, and unfairness are already embedded within contemporary media ecosystems, digital platforms, political communication, and institutional narratives. Drawing from research in media psychology, political communication, behavioral sociology, and attention economy dynamics, this section demonstrates that the normalization of serious harm through humor is not accidental but structurally reinforced. The findings indicate that modern engagement-driven systems amplify comedic framing of systemic issues, gradually converting civic outrage into spectatorship and spectatorship into apathy.
1. From Cognitive Distortion to Structural Reality
The Comedic Veil is not confined to individual psychology. It operates as a cultural and systemic phenomenon. When humor becomes the dominant interpretive lens through which society encounters serious harm, the collective response to injustice shifts from intervention to consumption.
Modern societies are not unaware of corruption, inequality, injustice, or institutional unfairness.
They are repeatedly exposed to them.
But exposure increasingly occurs through satire, memes, comedic commentary, and ironic discourse rather than sustained moral analysis.
This shift alters not knowledge, but consciousness.
2. The Digital Ecosystem and the Memeification of Serious Harm
One of the clearest real-world manifestations of the Comedic Veil is the memeification of structural issues. Corruption scandals, governance failures, economic inequality, bureaucratic inefficiency, and institutional injustice are frequently converted into viral comedic formats.
Psychologically, repetition within humorous formats produces desensitization. When a serious issue becomes a recurring joke template, the audience begins to process it as culturally routine rather than morally alarming.
The sequence is structurally consistent:
Serious event → Meme circulation → Shared amusement → Emotional dampening → Reduced urgency
Over time, systemic harm becomes socially digestible rather than morally intolerable.
3. Satirical Political Discourse and the Softening of Democratic Alarm
Political communication in modern societies increasingly relies on satire-heavy engagement. While satire historically functioned as critique of power, contemporary saturation of comedic political discourse produces an unintended normalization effect.
When corruption allegations, electoral misconduct, governance failures, or institutional decay are persistently discussed in humorous formats, they transform from civic crises into recurring entertainment narratives.
Citizens remain informed, yet emotionally detached.
Awareness persists.
Urgency declines.
This dynamic contributes to what behavioral research describes as issue fatigue, where repeated exposure without emotional escalation leads to disengagement rather than mobilization.
4. Institutional Corruption and the Absurdity Shield
Large-scale corruption, financial leakage, and bureaucratic misconduct should logically provoke sustained public outrage due to their long-term civilizational cost. However, digital discourse frequently metabolizes such revelations into comedic commentary.
This produces what may be termed an Absurdity Shield.
When corruption is continuously joked about as inevitable, cultural, or absurd, its structural severity becomes psychologically obscured.
The public response shifts from:
Moral alarm → Cynical amusement
Cynical amusement, unlike outrage, rarely produces sustained institutional accountability.
5. Humorization of Inequality and the Cultural Familiarization of Injustice
Economic inequality and systemic unfairness are increasingly embedded within comedic narratives, satire formats, and ironic social commentary. While humor may raise awareness, repetitive comedic framing produces familiarity without resolution.
Familiarity alters perception.
The extraordinary becomes ordinary.
The unjust becomes expected.
When inequality becomes a cultural joke rather than a structural crisis, society psychologically adjusts to its presence rather than resisting it. This is normalization through repetition, not endorsement through ideology.
6. Entertainment Culture and the Spectacle of Victims
Modern entertainment ecosystems frequently transform human vulnerability into consumable spectacle. Humiliation-based humor, ridicule narratives, and ironic commentary about distress contribute to the satirization of victims at scale.
When victims are repeatedly portrayed through comedic or sarcastic lenses, a perceptual shift occurs. Audiences begin to interpret expressions of suffering as performative, exaggerated, or narratively stylized rather than authentic.
The victim remains visible.
But is cognitively mis-seen.
This misperception weakens empathic recognition and reduces moral responsiveness.
7. Algorithmic Amplification and the Incentive Structure of Humor
Engagement-driven platforms structurally reward content that evokes high-arousal emotional reactions such as amusement, outrage, and ridicule. Humor about serious issues spreads faster than analytical discourse because it is cognitively easier to consume and socially shareable.
This creates a systemic asymmetry:
Comedic framing of injustice gains amplification
Nuanced ethical discourse receives lower engagement
Over time, public perception becomes shaped not by the severity of issues but by the tone in which they are repeatedly presented. The algorithm does not evaluate moral gravity. It prioritizes engagement velocity.
8. Spectator Citizenship and the Passive Consumption of Crisis
The Comedic Veil contributes to the transformation of citizens into spectators. When governance failures, corruption scandals, and institutional injustices are consumed primarily as humorous content, civic engagement weakens.
Political events begin to resemble episodic narratives rather than structural realities requiring intervention. Public discourse shifts toward commentary, satire, and ironic observation instead of sustained civic action.
This results in spectator citizenship, where individuals observe systemic harm, discuss it humorously, and move on without meaningful engagement.
9. Global Discourse, Cynicism, and the Humorization of Existential Issues
Even large-scale systemic risks such as governance instability, geopolitical tension, and civilizational threats are increasingly framed through dark humor, ironic commentary, and fatalistic satire.
This phenomenon functions as a psychological coping mechanism but also produces long-term consequences. Repeated joking about serious existential issues reduces perceived immediacy and fosters fatalistic detachment.
The issue is acknowledged.
But emotionally distanced.
Cynicism replaces urgency, and urgency is essential for collective action.
10. The Political Utility of Amused Populations
A population that laughs at systemic failures is less likely to sustain long-term resistance against them. Amusement diffuses anger. Cynicism diffuses organization. Satirical normalization diffuses accountability pressure.
From a structural perspective, humor-driven discourse can unintentionally stabilize dysfunctional systems by converting moral crises into cultural entertainment cycles. This does not require coordinated intent. It emerges naturally within attention economies that reward engagement over ethical depth.
11. The Feedback Loop of the Comedic Veil
The systemic operation of the Comedic Veil can be understood as a reinforcing loop:
Systemic Harm → Comedic Framing → Viral Dissemination → Emotional Desensitization → Cultural Familiarity → Apathy → Continued Systemic Harm
This loop is self-sustaining because each cycle reduces emotional sensitivity while increasing normalization of structural injustice.
12. Conclusion of Part II
Empirical patterns across digital culture, media ecosystems, political discourse, and entertainment structures demonstrate that the humorization of corruption, inequality, injustice, and unfairness is already widespread and structurally reinforced.
The Comedic Veil does not eliminate awareness of serious harm.
It reduces emotional intensity toward it.
Societies remain informed about systemic injustice while becoming psychologically accustomed to its persistence. The result is not ignorance but normalized consciousness of harm without corresponding moral urgency.
This normalization is profoundly consequential. A society that repeatedly encounters serious harm through humor gradually shifts from resistance to resignation, from outrage to amusement, and from engagement to passive spectatorship.
Part III will synthesize the cognitive and systemic findings into a civilizational framework, examining the long-term ethical, psychological, and strategic implications of sustained humor-normalization of serious harm and the potential deliberate misuse of the Comedic Veil in power structures and influence systems.
PART III
Civilizational Implications, Consciousness Erosion, and the Strategic Exploitability of the Comedic Veil
Abstract
This final part synthesizes the cognitive and systemic findings into a civilizational framework. It examines how the sustained humorization of serious harm reshapes collective consciousness, weakens civic empathy, and alters the long-term response capacity of societies toward injustice, corruption, inequality, and institutional failure. Beyond passive cultural consequences, this section analyzes the strategic exploitability of the Comedic Veil by power structures, influence systems, and narrative ecosystems. The central conclusion is that the normalization of serious harm through humor is not merely a communicative trend but a consciousness-altering process that can erode accountability, dilute moral urgency, and structurally stabilize harmful systems without requiring overt censorship or suppression.
1. From Cultural Pattern to Civilizational Condition
When the humorization of serious harm becomes persistent across media, discourse, and institutions, it ceases to be a cultural style and evolves into a civilizational condition.
A civilization does not collapse only through violence, scarcity, or external threat.
It can also decline through gradual erosion of moral sensitivity.
If corruption is continuously joked about,
if inequality is repeatedly memeified,
if injustice becomes ironic commentary,
the collective consciousness adapts to the abnormal as if it were routine.
This adaptation is psychological, not ideological.
2. Consciousness Erosion Through Repetitive Comedic Framing
Human cognition is shaped by repeated exposure patterns. When serious harms are repeatedly encountered in humorous formats, the nervous system reduces emotional reactivity through adaptive desensitization.
This produces a subtle but dangerous shift:
Recognition without reaction.
Awareness without urgency.
Knowledge without empathy.
Over time, the public may intellectually understand systemic injustice while emotionally disengaging from it. This state of informed apathy is more structurally dangerous than ignorance because it neutralizes collective response mechanisms.
3. The Transformation of Moral Outrage into Cynical Amusement
Moral outrage is a high-energy psychological state that drives reform, resistance, and institutional accountability. Humor, particularly repetitive satire about serious harm, gradually converts this high-energy state into low-energy cynical amusement.
Cynical amusement differs from denial.
It acknowledges the problem while simultaneously trivializing its urgency.
When injustice becomes a recurring joke, the mind shifts from
“This must be changed”
to
“This is how things are.”
This cognitive transition is the foundation of normalization.
4. The Apathy Threshold and Social Inaction
Every society possesses an implicit empathy threshold that determines when collective action is triggered. The Comedic Veil gradually raises this threshold.
As exposure to humorized injustice increases, increasingly severe events are required to generate the same level of moral alarm. Minor injustices become jokes. Moderate injustices become routine. Severe injustices risk becoming normalized spectacles.
Once this threshold rises sufficiently, systemic harm can persist without sustained public resistance.
5. Institutional Consequences: Accountability Dilution
Institutions rely on public scrutiny, moral pressure, and civic engagement to maintain accountability. When systemic failures are consistently framed humorously, scrutiny weakens.
The mechanism is indirect yet powerful:
Humor reduces emotional intensity.
Reduced intensity reduces sustained attention.
Reduced attention reduces accountability pressure.
Corruption discussed as comedy rarely sustains investigative momentum.
Inequality discussed as satire rarely sustains policy urgency.
Injustice discussed as humor rarely sustains reform demand.
6. The Strategic Exploitability of the Comedic Veil
One of the most critical and underexamined implications is that the Comedic Veil can be deliberately or structurally exploited.
A system seeking to minimize resistance to serious harm does not necessarily need to suppress information. Suppression creates suspicion and resistance. Humorization creates diffusion and apathy.
The more effective strategy is reframing rather than silencing.
Instead of hiding injustice, it can be:
Ridiculed
Memeified
Satirized
Converted into recurring comedic discourse
Once a victim becomes a joke and a crisis becomes content, public empathy declines without the appearance of censorship.
7. Victim Delegitimization Through Satirical Perception
When victims are repeatedly portrayed through irony, parody, or ridicule, a perceptual distortion emerges in public cognition. Expressions of suffering may be interpreted as exaggeration, dramatization, or performative narrative rather than authentic distress.
This produces a legitimacy erosion effect.
The victim is visible.
The suffering is acknowledged.
But the emotional credibility is weakened.
Such perception reduces intervention impulses and fosters passive observation rather than moral engagement.
8. Political and Narrative Power Dynamics
In narrative ecosystems, control over framing often holds greater influence than control over facts. Humor-driven framing can shape public interpretation more subtly than direct propaganda because it lowers cognitive resistance.
A serious allegation framed humorously receives attention without sustained moral escalation.
A systemic failure framed satirically becomes culturally digestible.
This allows harmful systems to persist within an environment of informed but emotionally disengaged populations.
9. The Attention Economy and the Incentive to Trivialize Serious Harm
Modern communication structures prioritize engagement velocity over ethical depth. Humorous content spreads faster, requires less cognitive effort, and generates stronger immediate reactions than complex ethical discourse.
As a result, discourse about corruption, inequality, injustice, and unfairness increasingly adopts comedic formats because they are more shareable and socially consumable.
This produces an unintended but powerful structural effect:
The tone of discourse becomes lighter as the severity of issues remains heavy.
The mismatch between tone and reality accelerates normalization.
10. Long-Term Civilizational Risk: Normalized Injustice
A civilization repeatedly exposed to humorized injustice may gradually internalize systemic harm as a permanent background condition.
The psychological danger is not acceptance through approval.
It is acceptance through habituation.
When corruption becomes expected,
when inequality becomes culturally routine,
when injustice becomes narratively familiar,
society loses its shock reflex.
Without shock, urgency declines.
Without urgency, reform weakens.
11. Ethical Consequences: The Collapse of Shared Empathy
Empathy functions as the binding agent of social cohesion and moral responsibility. The sustained operation of the Comedic Veil erodes this shared empathy by converting moral subjects into narrative objects and crises into spectacles.
This erosion is gradual, cumulative, and often unnoticed.
Individuals continue to engage with discourse.
But their emotional depth of engagement declines over time.
The result is a society that discusses suffering extensively while responding to it minimally.
12. Final Synthesis: The Comedic Veil as a Mechanism of Passive Stabilization of Harm
The Comedic Veil does not require denial, censorship, or propaganda to function. It operates through repetition, framing, and emotional modulation.
By humorizing serious harm and satirizing victims, discourse gradually shifts:
Outrage becomes amusement.
Amusement becomes familiarity.
Familiarity becomes apathy.
This transition stabilizes harmful systems because apathy generates less resistance than outrage and less scrutiny than moral alarm.
13. Concluding Statement
The humorization of corruption, inequality, injustice, and victims does not eliminate awareness of harm. It alters consciousness toward harm. A society operating under the Comedic Veil remains informed yet emotionally desensitized, observant yet disengaged, aware yet apathetic.
This is the deepest civilizational risk.
Not ignorance of injustice.
But normalization of injustice through repeated comedic framing.
When serious harm becomes culturally humorous, victims become narratively diminished, systemic failures become routine discourse, and collective empathy gradually erodes. In such a condition, injustice does not need to be hidden to persist. It only needs to be repeatedly presented as something to laugh at rather than something to confront.
ANNEXURE:
Full Citations (With Direct Links)
Jazaieri, H., & Rucker, D. D. (2025). Satire, Dehumanization, and Social Judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology.
Full Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39946617/American Psychological Association. (2025). Satire Can Be More Harmful Than Direct Criticism, New Research Finds.
Full Link: https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2025/02/satire-damaging-reputationsGreater Good Science Center, University of California, Berkeley. How Satire Changes Our Opinion of Someone.
Full Link: https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/how_satire_changes_our_opinion_of_someoneKellogg School of Management, Northwestern University. Does Satire Soften the Blow of Criticism?
Full Link: https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/does-satire-soften-the-blow-of-criticismFord, T. E., & Ferguson, M. A. (2004). Social Consequences of Disparagement Humor. American Psychological Association.
Full Link: https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/features/tps-tps0000052.pdfBandura, A. (1999). Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review.
Full Link: https://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/Bandura1999JPSP.pdfBrady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017). Emotion Shapes the Diffusion of Moralized Content in Social Networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Full Link: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1618923114Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2001). Effects of Violent Media on Aggression, Empathy, and Desensitization. Psychological Science.
Full Link: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2001-01592-001Fanti, K. A., Vanman, E., Henrich, C. C., & Avraamides, M. N. (2009). Desensitization to Media Violence Over a Short Period of Time. Aggressive Behavior.
Full Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19636700/Baumgartner, J., & Morris, J. S. (2006). The Daily Show Effect: Candidate Evaluations, Efficacy, and American Youth. Public Opinion Quarterly.
Full Link: https://academic.oup.com/poq/article/70/3/341/1889265Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “Fake News”: A Typology of Scholarly Definitions. Digital Journalism.
Full Link: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1461444818765126Starr, R. (2026). The Culture of Cruelty: The Psychopathology of Ridicule in Modern Entertainment.
Full Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/400025343_The_Culture_of_Cruelty_The_Psychopathology_of_Ridicule_in_Modern_EntertainmentMcGraw, A. P., & Warren, C. (2010). Benign Violations: Making Immoral Behavior Funny. Psychological Science.
Full Link: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0956797610376073Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An Integrative Review. Personality and Social Psychology Review.
Full Link: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander Intervention in Emergencies: Diffusion of Responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Full Link: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1969-03938-001Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What Makes Online Content Viral? Journal of Marketing Research.
Full Link: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1509/jmr.10.0353Van Bavel, J. J., et al. (2021). The Spread of True and False News Online. Science.
Full Link: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aap9559Nabi, R. L., Moyer-Gusé, E., & Byrne, S. (2007). All Joking Aside: A Serious Investigation into the Persuasive Effect of Funny Social Issue Messages. Communication Monographs.
Full Link: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03637750701473724Young, D. G. (2013). Laughter, Learning, or Enlightenment? Viewing and Avoidance Motivations Behind The Daily Show and The Colbert Report. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media.
Full Link: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08838151.2013.787080Billig, M. (2005). Laughter and Ridicule: Towards a Social Critique of Humour.
Full Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233495990_Laughter_and_Ridicule_Towards_a_Social_Critique_of_Humour
